Legal Opinion
Michael v. City of Rochester
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 12, 1979No. 79-055PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This case concerns the validity of an agreement by which the city of Rochester obligated itself to reimburse George Michael money he expended to extend a city water main to his property. Trial in Superior Court (Dunfey, C.J.) resulted in a verdict for plaintiff requiring the city to pay all monies due and owing, and monies received in the future under the terms of the agreement. The city excepted to the denial of its requests for certain rulings, to the verdict and to the denial of its motions to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. We affirm the trial court.
In 1959, the Rochester City…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woart v. WinnickSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1826
- Pepin v. BeaulieuSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959
- Marshall v. Borough of Ellwood CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Home Insurance Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Atherton v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Frank B. Abbadessa v. Moore Business Forms, Inc., Robert D. Mariotti v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Winslow v. Town of Holderness Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Quinlan v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Totty v. Grantham Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Appeal of CheneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.