Legal Opinion

Occupy Columbia v. Haley

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided February 7, 2013No. C/A No. 3:11-cv-03253-CMCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint or for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rules 12(b) and 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants argue that Plaintiffs’ claims for injunctive relief are moot and that Defendants have qualified immunity as to Plaintiffs’ claims for money damages. For reasons explained below, the court grants Defendants’ motion as to Plaintiffs’ claims for injunctive relief and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Occupy Nashville v. William HaslamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Occupy Nashville v. HaslamDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API