Legal Opinion

Livers v. Ardinger

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 24, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County.

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

In this case the motion to dismiss the appeal must prevail.

The forty-first rule of the Circuit Court for Washington County, provides that every exception must be noted at the time of the ruling made, but may be reduced to writing and submitted to the Judge or Judges for his or their signature, within a reasonable time after the trial. It further provides, that “in every case, unless otherwise expressly allowed by the Court, the bill of exceptions shall be prepared and submitted to the Court during the sittings of the term at which such exception shall be taken.”

Ever since the statute of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. State ex rel. James v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  3. Baltimore Building Ass'n No. 2 v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United Railways & Electric Co. v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  2. Ray v. MorseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  3. Boyd v. KellogCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  4. Sieling v. BrunnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API