Legal Opinion
Norvell-Wilder Hardware Co. v. McCamey
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 3, 1926No. 245. [fn*]PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPannill, C. J.
The parties will be designated as in the trial court, wherein the plaintiff in error was plaintiff and the defendants in error were defendants.
The suit was upon a verified account, which was denied under oath, and a cross-action urged by defendants for damages in the sum of $625 for the breach of an implied warranty in the sale by the plaintiff to the defendants of a certain wire drilling line.
The only questions presented relate to the correctness of the judgment in favor of the defendants on their cross-action in the sum of $625. The plaintiff was engaged in the business of selling supplies…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grigsby v. ReibTexas Supreme Court · 1913
- Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Great Southern Life Insurance v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- A. S. Cameron Steam Pump Works v. Lubbock Light & Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Houston Cotton Oil Co. v. TrammellTexas Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bedner v. Dunigan Tool & Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
- Craftsman Glass, Inc. v. CatheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Ruberoid Company, Incorporated v. W. P. Briscoe and Gordon L. Briscoe, Doing Business as Briscoe & BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Adams v. Bailey Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.