Legal Opinion

C.P. Motion, Inc. v. Goldblatt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 27, 2016No. 3D14-2034PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLagoa, J.

Appellants, C.P. Motion, Inc. (“CP”), and the Raymond and Selma Weis-bein Irrevocable Trust (“WT”), appeal from an order denying CP’s motion to substitute party and a final order dismiss ing CP’s counterclaim against Appellees, Richard Goldblatt and Valerie Goldblatt (the “Goldblatts”). 1 For the following reasons, we reverse.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

As set forth in Goldblatt v. C.P. Motion, Inc., 77 So.3d 798 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), in 1999, Richard Goldblatt and Raymond Weisbein formed CP to distribute orthopedic equipment. The parties subsequently terminated their business…

2Cases cited15 opinions

Rosecrans v. William S. Lozier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
Charles L. Bowman & Company, a Michigan Corporation v. C. Ward ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
Cordis Corporation v. Sonics International, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
In Re Pilz Compact Disc, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
Levine v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Spa Creek Servs., LLC v. S.W. Cole, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017