Legal Opinion

Harner v. USAA General Indemnity Company

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 27, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01993Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL HARNER, Case No.: 18-CV-1993 W (MDD) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 14 USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE COMPANY, 15 ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL Defendant. SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 14] 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Defendant USAA General Indemnity Co’s motion for 19 summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment. Plaintiff Paul 20 Harner opposes. 21 The Court decides the motion on the papers submitted, and without…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API