Legal Opinion
Helcher v. Dearborn County
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 9, 2010No. 07-3949PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC (“Bell”) applied for a conditional use permit to construct a wireless communication facility (essentially, a cellphone tower) on property owned by Dan and Merry Helcher in Dearborn County, Indiana. 1 When the local Board of Zoning Appeals (“Zoning Board” or “Board”) denied the application, Bell sued the Board and its members for violating various provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 332(c). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, and Bell appeals. We affirm.
I
Bell, a wireless service…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. WillothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. FormanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Jtc Petroleum Company v. Piasa Motor Fuels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- General Insurance Co. of America v. Clark Mall Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Arrow Gear Co. v. Downers Grove Sanitary DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Green Mountain Realty Corp. v. LeonardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of Milton, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Athens Cellular Inc. v. Oconee County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.