In re Randall
District Court, D. Oregon
On January 9, 1860, [E. G.] Randall and [John] Sunderland being insolvent assigned all their property to Foster with intent to evade the bankrupt act.
Read the full summary
On January 9, 1860, [E. G.] Randall and [John] Sunderland being insolvent assigned all their property to Foster with intent to evade the bankrupt act. On January 30, the firm of Einstein Bros. & Co., doing business in San Francisco, filed a petition in bankruptcy in this court against It. and S., praying that they might be adjudged bankrupts on account of such assignment; and on February 27, after a hearing upon the petition and answer thereto, It. and S. were duly adjudged bankrupts for the causes stated in the petition. [Case No. 11.551.] Afterwards, Einstein Bros. & Co. having proved their…
1Opinion of the Court
DEADY, District Judge.
This is a motion by a creditor to reject a claim of another creditor, as being illegal.
From the report of the register it appears that on February 2. 1869, Einstein Bros. & Co. received at San Francisco, $450, in coin, from Foster on account of R. and S., and that they had good reason to believe at that time that R. and S. were insolvent; and that their attorney, then resident in Portland, acting under instructions to take such course as their interests required, had on January 30, commenced the proeedings in bankruptcy wherein R. and S. were adjudged bankrupts; and that…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Chatfield v. O'DwyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Amick v. Mortgage Security CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- In re Mexico Hardware Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1912