Legal Opinion

Cleveland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 8, 2012No. 1D11-3483PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant challenges his convictions and sentences for felony battery and giving a false name or identification to a law enforcement officer, arguing, among other things, that the trial court denied his motion to represent himself without conducting an adequate Faretta inquiry. The State properly concedes error on this point. For this reason, we reverse. We decline to address the remaining issues, two of which are moot and two of which do not establish reversible error.

When a criminal defendant moves to discharge court-appointed counsel and represent himself, the court must inform the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Flowers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. Neal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sparaga v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Scott A. Stanley v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API