Scott A. Stanley v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Scott Stanley appeals his judgment and sentence'upon violation of probation, raising two issues: whether the trial cotirt erred by failing to conduct an adequate Faretta * inquiry, and whether the trial court erred by failing to renew its offer of counsel before imposing’ sentence. Because we agree that the trial court’s Faretta inquiry was insufficient to demonstrate that Stanley knowingly and intelligently waived the right to counsel, we do not reach thé second issue.
A defendant “shall not be considered to have waived the assistance of counsel until the entire process of offering counsel…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Flowers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Cleveland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sylvester Hooks v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017