Legal Opinion

Hoagland v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoedest, J.

This was an action by the railroad company against the appellant, upon a subscription to the capital stock of the company. Judgment for the plaintiff.

The defendant, it appears, was one of the subscribers to the articles of association, and subscribed for ten shares of stock, at 50 dollars per share. The articles of association fixed the amount of capital stock at 2,500,000 dollars, to consist of shares of 50 dollars each, with a provision for the increase of the stock from time to time. The terms of the subscription required payment to be made to the company, or the board of directors, “ in…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Newcastle & Andersontown Turnpike Co. v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Oldtown & Lincoln Railroad v. VeazieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855
  3. Penobscot & Kennebec Railroad v. DunnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burke v. MeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Fox v. Allensville, Center Square, & Vevay Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Emmitt v. Springfield, Jackson & Pomeroy RailroadOhio Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Jewett v. Valley Railway Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API