Legal Opinion

State v. Robert Joseph Yetman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 22, 2016No. 14-15-01072-CR, NO. 14-15-01073-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice

In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting a criminal defendant’s application for pretrial habeas-corpus relief. The trial court held that the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy bars the defendant’s retrial following a mistrial because the prosecutor, seeking to avoid an acquittal, goaded the defense into requesting the mistrial. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Appellee Robert Joseph Yetman was indicted for indecency with a child. Appellee was accused of touching the genitalia of a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. State v. KellyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Miguel Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018
  2. Ex Parte Guadalupe Contreras v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2025
  3. Ex Parte Miguel Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018
  4. John Wooten v. Pat WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. Tiffany Johnson v. Harris County District Attorney's Office, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API