State v. Ingram
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, C. J.
After careful consideration of all tbe evidence offered by tbe State, as set out in tbe record, we reach tbe conclusion tbat it was insufficient to support tbe charge of assault upon tbe State’s witness, and tbat tbe motion for judgment of nonsuit aptly interposed should have been allowed.
While tbe elements necessary to constitute tbe common law offense of assault have been many times stated in the decisions of this Court and in tbe courts in other jurisdictions as well as by textwriters, it is sometimes difficult to determine whether tbe particular facts under consideration are sufficient in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Akins v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State v. . PrinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- People v. DoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. . HefnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. GoughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.