Legal Opinion
Happy House Amusement, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 10, 1992No. 90-550PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff, Happy House Amusement, Inc., appeals from a decision of the Superior Court {Goode, J.) that the defendant, New Hampshire Insurance Company, is not obligated to defend or provide insurance coverage to the plaintiff in connection with a civil action brought against it by Chadwick Baross, Inc. (Chadwick). We reverse and remand.
Chadwick is in the business of leasing and selling construction equipment. Chadwick sued the plaintiff for damages sustained to Chadwick’s bulldozer during a demonstration. The writ alleged in pertinent part that the plaintiff “negligently drove the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Johnson Shoes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Glens Falls Insurance Company v. FieldsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Fish v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Mead v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
3Cited by13 opinions
- M. Mooney Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Green Mountain Insurance v. ForemanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- P.J. Noyes Co. v. American Motorists InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
- Amica Mutual Insurance Company v. Beverly P. MutrieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Mottolo v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.