Legal Opinion

People v. Outcault

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1949No. Crim. 4271PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment of guilty of violating section 286 of the Penal Code (the infamous crime against nature), predicated upon defendant’s plea of guilty to such charge before the committing magistrate, defendant appeals. There are also appeals from the denial of defendant’s motions to (1) withdraw his plea of guilty, and (2) vacate the judgment committing defendant, allegedly without probable cause or testimony to support such order, or certifying defendant to the superior court under section 859a of the Penal Code.

Facts

May 11,1948, a warrant was issued for the arrest of defendant predicated upon…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. AvilezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. People v. McGarvyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. People v. GottliebCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. People v. ZolotoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. In Re WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. CarusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. People v. Van ValkenburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. In Re HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. NanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. State v. MartinezIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API