Legal Opinion
Lunney v. Lunney
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 2012No. 2011 CU 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, C.J.
|2Leslie Ann Shoebotham appeals a judgment of the trial court modifying the shared custody arrangement set forth in a prior consent judgment, but denying her requests that custody be changed from the shared fifty-fifty arrangement of the consent judgment and that she be named domiciliary parent.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Leslie Shoebotham and Glynn Lunney are the divorced parents of three children, born December 12, 1993, August 19, 1996, and April 22, 1998. The youngest two children have special needs. After their divorce, Ms. Shoebotham and Mr. Lunney reached an agreement regarding custody…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O.K. Realty Co. v. John A. Juliani, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Nee v. N. O. Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Cochran v. Pelican Well Tool & Supply Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- Bergeron v. BergeronSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- American Home Building Co. v. SlateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chandler v. ChandlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Carollo v. CarolloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Burns v. BurnsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017