Legal Opinion
Smither v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 21, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-2265Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DONALD Q. SMITHER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-02265 (UNA) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, initiated this matter on July 8, 2025, by filing a civil Complaint (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1, and an Application for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2. On July 24, 2025, the Court denied Plaintiff’s IFP Application because it provided little information about his financial circumstances. See Order, ECF No. 22. The Court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- In Re Melvin M. Marin. Melvin M. Marin v. William K. Suter, Clerk, United States Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- United States v. ChoiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Lewis v. GreenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.