Legal Opinion
Barden v. City of Sacramento
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 12, 2002No. 01-15744PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
We must decide whether public sidewalks in the City of Sacramento are a service, program, or activity of the City within the meaning of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12132, or § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794. We hold that they are and, accordingly, that the sidewalks are subject to program accessibility regulations promulgated in furtherance of these statutes. We therefore reverse the order of the district court and remand for further proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).
*1075BACKGROUN…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Frame v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Guillermo Robles v. Dominos Pizza LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Seremeth v. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS FREDERICK COUNTYCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- American Council of the Blind v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.