Legal Opinion

Wright v. Swayne

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1911No. 2320PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Original application to the Supreme Court by Wright and others for writ of mandamus against Swayne as district judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey

On July 25, 1911, a petition for mandamus was presented to this court in the above cause during vacation. The petition was directed to be filed, and the clerk was ordered to issue citation to respondent, requiring him to answer on the first day of the present term of the court and show cause, if any he had, why the writ of mandamus should not issue as prayed for.

The respondent made answer at some length, as will hereinafter appear, and the question was argued at the bar of this court by both relator and respondent, and able and exhaustive briefs were filed by counsel representing both parties.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Randall v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Boyce's Administrator v. Smith's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  3. Lovell v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Collins v. BallowTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. State ex rel. Albers v. HornerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MuseTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CantyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Southland-Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1935

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API