Legal Opinion

Texas & New Orleans Railway Co. v. Hare

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 1, 1893No. 177PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the District Court of Liberty. Tried below before Hon. L. B. Hightower.

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error in this case, because an appeal therein by the plaintiff in error, with supersedeas bond, has been heretofore dismissed for the want of prosecution.

Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error in the District Court of Liberty County, August 19, 1891, from which the plaintiff in error perfected an appeal, with supersedeas bond, to the term of the Supreme Court at Galveston, 1892. Plaintiff in error duly filed the transcript in the Supreme Court at said term, but having failed to file…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perez v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Thompson v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Thomas v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brillhart v. BeeverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
  3. Groendyke v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  5. Loring v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API