Legal Opinion

Pime v. Loyola University of Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 16, 1986No. Nos. 84-1853, 84-1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Appellant Jerrold S. Pime brought suit against Loyola University of Chicago under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a), for religious discrimination in the hiring of tenure track professors in Loyola’s College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Philosophy. The Department of Philosophy had passed a resolution reserving the next three vacancies in tenure track teaching positions for Jesuits, members of the Society of Jesus.

Loyola asserted two affirmative defenses. First, it claimed that it could require its employees to be Jesuits…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Berkman v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Pime v. Loyola University of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Killinger v. Samford UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Kemmerer Village, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Tagatz v. Marquette UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1988
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kamehameha Schools/Bishop EstateDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1991
  5. Young v. Northern Illinois Conference of United Methodist ChurchDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API