Legal Opinion

Nine Mile Irrigation District v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1929No. 26775PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The Nine Mile Irrigation District brought this action to recover damages from the state of Nebraska, sustained by the construction of a bridge across the North Platte riven on a county highway in Scotts Bluff county. From a verdict and judgment in favor of the district, the state appeals.

The claim for damages is based upon the proposition/ that the bridge which was constructed under the provisions of the act providing for state aid (sections 8856-8363, Comp. St. 1922) was so constructed as to divert from its course water in the North Platte river in such a manner that the district was unable…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Roe v. Howard CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. EmmertNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Douglas County v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Shear v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Van Wanning v. DeeterNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gledhill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Armbruster v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Schmutte v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Enterprise Irrigation District v. WillisNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Cox v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API