Jones v. Burgess
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Grant county against Robert Burgess and Charles Burgess, copartners as Burgess & Son, to recover $2,800. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Flaherty, J., who denied the defendants’ motion to direct a verdict in their favor, and a jury which returned a verdict for $3,782.60 in favor of plaintiffs. Defendants’ motion for a new trial was denied. From the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
Action to recover damages for fraudulent representations claimed to have been made by defendants’ agents in the sale of a stallion to plaintiffs. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $3,-782.60. Defendants’ motion for a new trial was denied, judgment entered on the verdict, and this appeal taken from such judgment.
Defendants, • who reside at Wenona, Illinois, are engaged in the business of buying, importing and selling Belgian and Perdieron *267■draft horses for breeding purposes. Plaintiffs are the members of a partnership called the Herman Belgian Horse Association, organized…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Clements Auto Company v. Service Bureau CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
- Reese v. National Surety Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Daugherty v. May Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.