Legal Opinion
Dickstein v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 9, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
295 N.J. Super. 550 (1996)
685 A.2d 943
ROBERT S. DICKSTEIN AND JANET DICKSTEIN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS-CROSS-APPELLANTS,
v.
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., AND CHRISTINE M. BERNIUS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 12, 1996.
Decided December 9, 1996.
Before Judges PETRELLA, WALLACE and KIMMELMAN.
Lawrence D. Ross argued the cause for appellants-cross respondents (Bressler, Amery & Ross, attorneys; Lawrence D. Ross and Daniel T. Kopec of counsel; Mr. Ross, on the brief).
Robert S. Dickstein, pro se, argued for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Western Union Financial Services, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. Western Union Financial Services, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2009