Legal Opinion
REVELO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1979No. ID 2691Published
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2691 MATTER OF REVELO In Visa Petition Proceedings A-19518541 Decided by Board March 7, 1979 (1) Under Connecticut law, a bona fide domicile by at least one of the parties to a foreig-n divorce in the country where the divorce took place is required for recognition, whether the divorce is ex parte or by mutual consent. Matter of Biebl, Interim Decision 2672 (BIA 1978); Litvaitis v. Litvaitis, 162 Conn. 540,
295 A.2d 519
(1972); Gildersleeve v. Gildersleeve, 88 Conn. 689,
92 A. 684
(1914). (2) A party must have a legally protected interest in order to participate in a judicial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- BRANTIGANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
- Litvaitis v. LitvaitisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Gildersleeve v. GildersleeveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.