State v. Roe
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In appealing his convictions, and his sentence for aggravated murder, appellant raises thirty-nine propositions of law. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals in all respects and uphold appellant’s sentence of death.
I
In propositions of law one through five, appellant raises challenges to the constitutionality of various portions of Ohio’s death penalty statutes, each of which arguments — save one — has been considered and rejected in several of our prior cases: State v. Jenkins (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 164, 15 OBR 311, 473 N.E. 2d 264; State v. Maurer…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SlagleOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1997
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.