Legal Opinion

State v. Roe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1989No. 87-1879PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Per curiam

In appealing his convictions, and his sentence for aggravated murder, appellant raises thirty-nine propositions of law. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals in all respects and uphold appellant’s sentence of death.

I

In propositions of law one through five, appellant raises challenges to the constitutionality of various portions of Ohio’s death penalty statutes, each of which arguments — save one — has been considered and rejected in several of our prior cases: State v. Jenkins (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 164, 15 OBR 311, 473 N.E. 2d 264; State v. Maurer…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. SlagleOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1997

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API