Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Diaz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 13, 1996PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree of two men and given consecutive terms of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. He was also convicted of unlawfully carrying a firearm. The evidence indicated that the defendant had sold drugs as part of a drug operation in Holyoke headed by Pedro Ramos and had participated in the killings to avenge wrongs to Ramos or his enterprise thought to have been committed by the victims. The defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant his convictions.

The defendant objects to the denial of his motion to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. BryantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. GodseyTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. DiGiambattistaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. Silva-SantiagoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. GroomeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. People v. FikeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API