Poland Coal Co. v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
There are two appeals by plaintiff; one in plaintiff’s action in equity for the cancellation of its deed and the other in its action at law to set aside the report and award made by-Eavenson pursuant to the mine-lease. The appeals were argued together on consolidated records ; we need only indicate our reasons for agreeing with the conclusions reached by President J udge Hook.
Appellant makes tivo points; that the court erred (1) in holding the option exercised by defendant valid instead of void under the rule against perpetuities; and (2) in holding that Eavenson,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Barton v. ThawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Thompson v. CoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Matter of FletcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Schroeder v. GemeinderNevada Supreme Court · 1875
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shepard & Morse Lumber Co. v. CollinsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Jean Camerlo v. Howard Johnson CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Exxon Corp. v. McManusMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997
- Ontario Gas Coal Co. v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Peters v. Hoover, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.