Legal Opinion

Poland Coal Co. v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1947No. Appeals, 156 and 157PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

There are two appeals by plaintiff; one in plaintiff’s action in equity for the cancellation of its deed and the other in its action at law to set aside the report and award made by-Eavenson pursuant to the mine-lease. The appeals were argued together on consolidated records ; we need only indicate our reasons for agreeing with the conclusions reached by President J udge Hook.

Appellant makes tivo points; that the court erred (1) in holding the option exercised by defendant valid instead of void under the rule against perpetuities; and (2) in holding that Eavenson,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Barton v. ThawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Thompson v. CoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Matter of FletcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Schroeder v. GemeinderNevada Supreme Court · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shepard & Morse Lumber Co. v. CollinsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Jean Camerlo v. Howard Johnson CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. Exxon Corp. v. McManusMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997
  4. Ontario Gas Coal Co. v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Peters v. Hoover, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API