Legal Opinion

United States v. Leola Harshaw A/K/A "Squeaky"

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 26, 1983No. 82-2071PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals from an order entered in the District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri 1 granting defendant Leola Harshaw’s motion for a mistrial. The mistrial was declared at the close of all the evidence in accordance with the procedures outlined in United States v. Bell, 573 F.2d 1040, 1044 (8th Cir.1978). The district court ruled that the government failed to establish the existence of a conspiracy between Harshaw and Osborne “Tuffy” Thomas, thereby rendering Tuffy’s hearsay statements inadmissible.' However, because Tuffy’s hearsay statements…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. CeccoliniSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. Michael BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. HelmelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. DowdellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Charles Wallace ShearsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. State v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API