Legal Opinion

United States v. Pedro Hernandez-Quintania

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 3, 2017No. 16-50171PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FREUDENTHAL, Chief District Judge:

Hernandez-Quintania appeals from a jury conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326, which makes it a felony for an alien who has previously been deported to reenter the United States -without the express consent of the Attorney General to reapply for admission. As a result of the conviction, the district court also found Hernandez-Quintánia violated the terms of his supervised release .from a prior 2014 illegal reentry conviction.

We find there was substantial evidence to support Hernandez-Quintania’s conviction and that the district court properly denied…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Snyder v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Miller v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Foster v. ChatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Giang Nguyen v. Scott FrauenheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. Hale v. Norcold IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  3. MATADAMAS-SERRANO (RUBEN) v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2026
  4. Timothy Eric Buford v. Raybon JohnsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API