United States v. Pedro Hernandez-Quintania
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FREUDENTHAL, Chief District Judge:
Hernandez-Quintania appeals from a jury conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326, which makes it a felony for an alien who has previously been deported to reenter the United States -without the express consent of the Attorney General to reapply for admission. As a result of the conviction, the district court also found Hernandez-Quintánia violated the terms of his supervised release .from a prior 2014 illegal reentry conviction.
We find there was substantial evidence to support Hernandez-Quintania’s conviction and that the district court properly denied…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Snyder v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Miller v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Foster v. ChatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Giang Nguyen v. Scott FrauenheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Hale v. Norcold IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- MATADAMAS-SERRANO (RUBEN) v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2026
- Timothy Eric Buford v. Raybon JohnsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025