Legal Opinion

Hale v. Norcold Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 20, 2020No. 2:18-cv-03597Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Suzanne Hale, et al., No. CV-18-03597-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Norcold Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This Order addresses the Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the 16 issues of punitive damages and emotional distress damages. (Doc. 56.) A recreational 17 vehicle (“RV”) owned by Suzanne and Jerry Hale (collectively “Plaintiffs” or the “Hales”) 18 was destroyed by a fire. Plaintiffs contend that a defective Norcold Series 1200 refrigerator 19 installed in their RV is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Ford v. Revlon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. United States v. Viken YacoubianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API