John A. Roebling Sons Co. v. Bear Valley Irrigation Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant, the Bear Valley Irrigation Company, from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action to enforce a mechanic’s lien, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
It is averred in the complaint that appellant’s grantor employed one Stebbins to construct a certain telephone line, and that respondent sold and delivered to said Stebbins certain materials which were intended to be used in, and were used in, the construction of said line. The court found these averments of the complaint to be true. It is doubtful if the evidence supports the finding…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Cohn v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Houghton v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- Smith v. PollockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by16 opinions
- Halbert's Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Wilson v. NugentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Ensele v. JolleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Stimson Mill Co. v. Los Angles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Western Elec. Co., Inc. v. ColleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.