Legal Opinion

In re Thompson

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 5, 1924No. 8726PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSON, District Judge.

This case raises the legal question whether a surety, who has paid the whole debt, has the right to dividends from the estate of an insolvent cosurety on the whole debt, or only on the proportionate part for which the cosurety is liable. The material facts of the case are these:

Anderson was the holder of 15 promissory notes, drawn by J. V. Thompson or J. R. Barnes, to the order of Semans, Hogsett, William M. Thompson, the bankrupt, Rosboro, and Hess, who indorsed the notes. Anderson recovered judgment against Thompson, the bankrupt, for the full amount of the notes,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chemical Nat. Bank v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  2. Lidderdale's Executors v. of RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Lidderdale v. RobinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia · 1824
  4. New Bedford Institution for Savings v. HathawayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Pace v. Pace's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. Bethlehem National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. American Surety Co. v. Bethlehem National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API