Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. National Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
The problem in this case, though superficially complicated, readily lends itself to solution by the application of well-recognized equitable principles.
On February 28,1933, Commercial National Bank of Philadelphia placed itself on a limited withdrawal basis and refused to honor the checks of its depositors: thereupon a Receiver was appointed to liquidate its affairs. Among the depositors were receivers and trustees in various bankruptcy proceedings who had on deposit in the bank sums totaling approximately $100,000. These funds were protected by two surety…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Armstrong v. American Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- American Surety Co. v. Bethlehem National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Board of Com'rs v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Lidderdale's Executors v. of RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Brothers v. Girard National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Keystone Bank v. Flooring Specialists, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Frazier EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1951
- Republic Realty Co. v. Phoenix Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Commonwealth v. Miklowitz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1966
- In re BaharaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.