Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. National Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1944No. Appeal, 22PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

The problem in this case, though superficially complicated, readily lends itself to solution by the application of well-recognized equitable principles.

On February 28,1933, Commercial National Bank of Philadelphia placed itself on a limited withdrawal basis and refused to honor the checks of its depositors: thereupon a Receiver was appointed to liquidate its affairs. Among the depositors were receivers and trustees in various bankruptcy proceedings who had on deposit in the bank sums totaling approximately $100,000. These funds were protected by two surety…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. American Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. American Surety Co. v. Bethlehem National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Board of Com'rs v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Lidderdale's Executors v. of RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  5. Brothers v. Girard National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Keystone Bank v. Flooring Specialists, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Frazier EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1951
  3. Republic Realty Co. v. Phoenix Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. Miklowitz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1966
  5. In re BaharaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API