Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Van Nest's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1917No. Docket No. 111PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Sanilac; Beach, J. Charles S. Hampton presented a claim against the estate of John W. Van Nest, deceased, for the amount of several promissory notes. The claim was disallowed in the probate court, and claimant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for defendant. Claimant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case originated in the probate’court of Sanilac county. The claim of the plaintiff having been disallowed by the commissioners on claims, there was an appeal to the circuit court for said county. This case and three others came on to be heard in the circuit court in accordance with a stipulation which provided that the said four cases might and should be tried at one and the same time by the same jury; that a separate verdict might and should be asked and taken for each case and separate judgments entered therein,‘but that the testimony which was competent and admissible in any of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. People v. HoffmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Edward Thompson Co. v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Spencer v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Williams v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bunda v. HardwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Ledbetter v. Brown City Savings BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Hoffman v. Monroe Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Edgerton v. LynchMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. People v. PalmertonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API