Legal Opinion

Williams v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Clark county. Hon. J. O. Andrews, Judge. Action by M. Williams against the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company to recover damages for the killing of stock. Verdict was given for defendant, and from an order granting a new trial defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

This appeal is from an order granting a new-trial upon the application of the plaintiff. Three statutory-grounds are designated in the notice of intention: (1) Irregularity in the proceedings of the court and jury; (2) misconduct of the jury; and (3) errors in law occurring at the trial. The first two of these grounds can be supported only by affidavits; the last by a bill of exceptions or statement of the case. • Comp, Laws, § 5089.

But one affidavit was served with the notice of intention. It is as follows: “E. A. Parmenter and Hans Lien, Sr., each being first duly sworn, on his oath deposes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grant v. GrantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Edward Thompson Co. v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chambers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  2. State v. BabbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Hampton v. Van Nest's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Missouri Slope Land & Investment Co. v. HasteadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Shann v. Disbrow & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API