Legal Opinion

Joe P. Cunningham, J. B. Cunningham and W. H. Swain, Independent Executors of the Estate of Harry T. Parker, Deceased v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 2, 1977No. 75-2574PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:

Upon the filing of a tax return for the estate of Harry Parker, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) asserted a deficiency, claiming that some $276,000 in gifts had been distributed by Mr. Parker in contemplation of death. The alleged deficiency was paid, and the filing for a refund being unfruitful, the estate brought suit in district court. A jury determined that Mr. Parker had not made the gifts in contemplation of death, but rather had acted with life motives. IRS now appeals, contending that the trial judge erred in not directing a verdict in its favor or granting it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Allen v. Trust Co. of Ga.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Estate of Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948
  5. Bel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnny Vineyard v. County of Murray, Georgia, Bill Hansird, as Former Sheriff of Murray County, Monte Chastain, Robert BishopCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Estate of Lidbury v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. Estate of Brownell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  4. Colvin v. CurtisDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
  5. Estate of Lidbury v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API