Legal Opinion
Carovillano v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 6, 2024No. 1:23-cv-04723Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHRISTOPHER CAROVILLANO and STEVEN BRANDT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 23 Civ. 4723 (PAE) Plaintiffs, OPINION & ORDER -v- SIRIUS XM RADIO INC., Defendant. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: In this putative class action, plaintiffs allege that defendant Sirius XM Radio Inc. (“Sirius XM”) promises its telephonic subscribers a particular monthly price, only to charge them an undisclosed 21.4% fee (the “U.S. Royalty Fee” or the “Fee”) on top of the agreed-upon price. Dkt. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 1, 42–43.…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.