Legal Opinion

Lippman v. City of South Bend

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9988PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

This cause was brought by the appellee against the appellant, before the mayor of said city, to recover a penalty for a violation of an ordinance of said city.

The verified complaint, omitting its title and the annexed affidavit, was as follows:

“ The city of South Bend, Indiana, complains of Leibman Lippman, and says that the defendant, on the 21st day of July, 1881, at the city and county aforesaid, and for a long time prior thereto, to wit, from April 1st, 1881, to said 21st day of July, 1881, violated section No. 5 of ordinance No. 457 of said eity, passed by the common council…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McMillen v. TerrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Scotten v. DivilbissIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. City of Huntington v. PeaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Alspaugh v. Ben Franklin Draining Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. City of Goshen v. KernIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Evansville v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Evans v. SchaferIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Board of Commissioners v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Arnold v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API