Legal Opinion
In Re Hughes, by and Through Ingram
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 6, 2017No. COA15-699-2; COA15-763-2; COA15-829-2PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGEE, Chief Judge.
*701 I. Facts and Procedural History
The General Assembly enacted the Eugenics Asexualization and Sterilization Compensation Program ("the Compensation Program"), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143B-426.50 et seq ., in 2013, in order to provide compensation to victims of the North Carolina Eugenics laws. 2013 N.C. Sess. Laws 360 , s. 6.18(a). Ms. Hughes ("Hughes"), Ms. Redmond ("Redmond"), and Mr. Smith ("Smith") (Hughes, Redmond, and Smith together, "the Victims") were all "sterilized involuntarily under the authority of the Eugenics Board of *682 North Carolina ['Eugenics Board'] in accordance…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Howard E. Mandell v. The County of Suffolk and John Gallagher, Police CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Hooper v. Bernalillo County AssessorSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arthur D. Jacobs v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Yan-Min Wang v. Unc-Ch School of MedicineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Town of Beech Mountain v. County of WataugaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re: DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020