Legal Opinion

In re: Davis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 2017No. COA 15-882-2Published

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Chief Judge.

*438 I. Supplemental Factual and Procedural Background

Claimant Davis ("Claimant") was involuntarily sterilized in 1946. Claimant makes three arguments on appeal: (1) that her involuntary sterilization "had to be performed under Public Law 1933, Chapter 224 in order to be performed lawfully," (2) that the full panel of the Industrial Commission's ("Full Commission") "strict construction of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143B-426.50(5) constitute[d] denial of compensation benefits to [her] due to an overly strict and technical construction of the statute[,]" and (3) the "[Full] Commission…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. RoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. GossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API