Hulme v. Woleslagel

I cannot agree with the statement shown as item No. 12 of the syllabus and therefore respectfully dissent from the holding expressed therein and from those portions of the opinion relating thereto. Also, my views concerning the holdings stated in items Nos. 7 and 8 of ihe syllabus differ to some extent from the corresponding expressions of the court with respect thereto. I fully agree with the other ten holdings itemized in the syllabus.

Briefly, the pertinent portions of K. S. A. 1971 Supp. 20-311d, as construed herein, require that an affidavit of disqualification must be made by a party…