Legal Opinion
Ginsberg v. Holt
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 4, 1956PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
86 So.2d 650 (1956)
Daniel L. GINSBERG, Appellant,
v.
George E. HOLT, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.
April 4, 1956.
Daniel L. Ginsberg, Miami, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
THOMAS, Justice.
The appellant, a member of the bar practicing in the Eleventh Circuit, represented in his complaint that the appellee was so prejudiced against him that no client of the appellant could get a fair and impartial trial at the hands of appellee. The appellant alleged that in two cases the appellee had voluntarily recused himself because of such prejudice against the appellant; that in a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. ParksSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Fuente v. HimesSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
3Cited by23 opinions
- Livingston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Hayslip v. DouglasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Hulme v. WoleslagelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- R.M.C. v. D.C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Town Centre of Islamorada, Inc. v. OverbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.