Legal Opinion
Roe v. Wier
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 14, 1942No. [No. 79, October Term, 1942.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtForsythe, J.
The appellant, Dudley G. Roe, and the appellees, David J. Ward and Leon Asa Andrus, were duly qualified candidates in the primary election held on September 8, 1942, for the nomination by the Democratic Party for the office of member of the House of Representatives in the Congress of the United States from the First Congressional District of Maryland.
After the official count by the judges of election of the votes cast in the Sixth Election District of Wicomico County, one of the counties comprised in the First Congressional District of Maryland, and after the official canvass of the votes by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parvin v. WimbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Carr v. Mayor of HyattsvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Hope v. FlentgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Hehl v. GuionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hammond v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Mahoney v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Mahoney v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Pelagatti v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- City of Seat Pleasant v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.