Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Holly v. Scott

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 12, 2006No. 05-6287Published

1Concurring in the judgmentDiana Gribbon Motz, Circuit Judge

The majority’s holding that private correctional employees are not governmental actors ignores or misreads controlling Supreme Court case law. Those cases, as well as numerous cases from other federal courts, establish that individual private correctional providers are government actors subject to liability as such. Accordingly, I cannot join the majority opinion. However, because Ricky Holly possesses an alternative remedy for his alleged injuries, no action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), lies…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API