Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings

District Court, D. Maine

Decided January 19, 1981No. Miscellaneous 80-56 PPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER OF THE COURT DENYING APPLICATION OF BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND OTHER RELIEF

GIGNOUX, Chief Judge.

On October 22, 1980, Bath Iron Works Corporation (BIW) filed with the Court an application for a protective order preventing attorneys of the Civil Division of the United States Department of Justice (“Civil Division”) from using documents produced by BIW pursuant to a grand jury subpoena duces tecum served upon its Vice President and General Counsel on July 31, 1980 in connection with a grand jury investigation of BIW, as well as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. MaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  4. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  5. In Re September 1971 Grand Jury. Richard J. Mara, A/K/A Richard J. Marasovich, Witness-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. WBZ-TV4 v. District Attorney for the Suffolk DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. In Re Doe Grand Jury ProceedingsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API