Legal Opinion

WBZ-TV4 v. District Attorney for the Suffolk District

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 19, 1990PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

In these consolidated appeals, WBZ-TV4 (WBZ) challenges orders of two single justices of this court denying WBZ access to materials in the so-called Carol Stuart murder case. The materials in question involve: (a) the videotape of a lineup at which Charles Stuart identified William Bennett as the man who had shot Stuart and his wife, Carol Stuart; and (b) a tape-recorded statement of a witness in the investigation.

Carol Stuart was murdered, and her husband, Charles Stuart, wounded, as they were driving home from a childbirth class at a Boston hospital on October 23, 1989. Charles Stuart…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico on Behalf of Judiciary Committee v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  3. Bougas v. Chief of Police of LexingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Lebowitch v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Boston Herald, Inc. v. SharpeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Dasey v. Massachusetts DepartCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Republican Co. v. Appeals CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Police CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. WanisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API