Legal Opinion

State v. Harmon, C-070585 (8-29-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 2008No. C-070585PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION. {¶ 1} In his single assignment of error, defendant-appellant Theodore R. Harmon asserts that the trial court erred in imposing a three-year term of imprisonment for violating the terms of a community-control sanction imposed in May 2005. The gravamen of Harmon's argument is that the trial court failed to apply the sentencing law in effect prior to the release of the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v.Foster1 to his July 2007 sentencing proceedings.

{¶ 2} In 2005, Harmon had entered pleas of guilty to two counts of pandering sexually oriented matter involving a minor, in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LeeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. BraggsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. FainOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API