Legal Opinion

Ownes v. Nagel

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1929No. 18545. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

Defendant in error, Everett Owens, began suit on a promissory note in the municipal court of Chicago against plaintiff in error, J. S. Nagel. There was a trial by jury, a directed verdict in favor of defendant in error for $1740, the judgment was affirmed by the Appellate Court, and the case is before this court on a writ of certiorari.

Defendant in error in his statement of claim alleged that a note for $1500 was executed by plaintiff in error on March 23, 1923, payable to the order of John F. Erisman, trustee, due one year after date; that the note, for a valuable consideration…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Geyser-Marion Gold-Min. Co. v. StarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. Justice v. StonecipherIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Foncannon v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. BruggerIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Kennell v. HerbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Sutton v. Eastern Viavi Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  4. Kelly v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
  5. Schmahl v. Aurora National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API