Legal Opinion

Oehmig v. City of Chattanooga

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

This proceeding under the declaratory judgments law presents an inquiry into the constitutionality of chapter 743, Private Acts of 1933, amending chapter 150, Private Acts of 1929. The chancellor sustained defendant’s demurrer to the bill and declared the amendatory act void. He held that it was violative of article 2, sections 28, 29, of the Constitution, because it authorized the application of unexpended municipal funds to the relief of taxpayers from special assessments for street improvement within the limits of Biverview.

The object of the original act was to extend the corporate limits…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Comm'rs of Tippecanoe Cty. v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. State ex rel. Bell v. CummingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Demoville & Co. v. Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Stonega Coke & Coal Co. v. Southern Steel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Lucas v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency v. LeechTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Watauga Valley Gas Co. v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State ex rel. Howard v. RegisterTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API